Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add view/entity for booted container images page #1745

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 27, 2025

Conversation

sambible
Copy link
Contributor

@sambible sambible commented Feb 19, 2025

Quick little airgun PR adding support for the booted container image page.

Supports: SatelliteQE/robottelo#17634

@sambible sambible added No-CherryPick PR doesnt need CherryPick to previous branches Stream labels Feb 19, 2025
@sambible sambible self-assigned this Feb 19, 2025
@sambible sambible requested a review from a team February 19, 2025 14:02
Copy link
Contributor

@LadislavVasina1 LadislavVasina1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Airgun looks good to me, let's wait for the robottelo PR to pass

Copy link
Contributor

@vsedmik vsedmik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Codewisely looks good to me. PRT and Vijay's comment pending.

@sambible sambible added CherryPick PR needs CherryPick to previous branches 6.17.z and removed No-CherryPick PR doesnt need CherryPick to previous branches Stream labels Feb 26, 2025
@vsedmik vsedmik merged commit 16621d5 into SatelliteQE:master Feb 27, 2025
9 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2025
* Add view/entity for booted container images page

* Clarify which issue the workaround is for

(cherry picked from commit 16621d5)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.17.z CherryPick PR needs CherryPick to previous branches
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants